AN ULTIMATUM
      Are We Going To Repeat The Blunders Of Previous Communities?
      by
      Edip Yüksel

      In the April, 1997 issue of Submitters Perspective, an article titled
      "Pilgrimage: Hajj and Umrah" made me concerned about the direction of this community. The author, in that article repeatedly asked the reader to
      REMEMBER "the duties of the Messenger of the Covenant," a messenger who repeatedly asked people to remember that accepting anything besides the Quran as a religious source was shirk. Where could a person find the duties of "the Messenger of Covenant?" Sure, the students of the Quran know well that there is no such list of duties in the Quran. The author, in his
      article written on religious matters, was repeatedly asking his reader to
      REMEMBER a source besides the Quran.

      A messenger might have had many duties and he might have listed them
      somewhere, but it is not the duty of Muslims (Submitters) to memorize or
      keep remembering the list of a particular messenger's duties. Their duty is
      to follow God's word alone and reject any other source or authority besides
      it.  It does not matter if the associated source is in written or oral.
      They are supposed to dedicate the religion to God alone (98:5).

      If we keep reminding each other of the words and writings of the late
      messenger, our children and grandchildren would most likely follow our
      advise and would remind each other of religious authorities besides the
      Quran, and as the sign of hypocrisy or ignorance, they might also be
      parroting the motto, "The Quran, the whole Quran, and nothing but the
      Quran."

      Distinguishing their messenger's hadith from that of the previous
      messenger's through pseudo differences does not change the fact that
      accepting anything besides the Quran as another authority is shirk, Period.
      There is no difference between orally narrated hadith that we cannot verify
      and that which is transmitted in print or by video tapes, which presumably
      we might be able to verify. Sayings or writings of messengers might be
      treated differently regarding their authenticity, but our rejection of
      Hadith and Sunnah was not based merely on their unreliability, but
      primarily on the fact that messengers were  not another authority or even
      teachers of God's religion.

      Abusing the authority of prophets and messengers, and presenting their
      words or writings as an other authority besides God's word is one of the
      most common and repeated blunders of "Submitters" of many generations.
      Unfortunately, our community has not been different. We have witnessed some so-called Submitters claiming the infallibility of "the Messenger of the
      Covenant." We have witnessed published articles claiming that "Kitab" (The
      Book) mentioned in the Quran refers to BOTH the Quran and Rashad's
      translation.

      We have seen people claiming that the video and audio tapes of "the Messenger of the Covenant" are necessary sources besides the Quran, in addition to his three versions of translation, footnotes, subtitles,
      appendices and articles, thereby making him a "prophet" with new
      revelations.  We have seen "Submitters" promoting  ridiculous
      interpretations to justify clear errors and contradictions in Rashad's
      translation. We have heard outrageous misinterpretations of the claim
      "authorized translation" as if it meant that every word and letter of
      Rashad's translation were divine, including the revised and re-revised
      versions.

      Attributing human errors and contradictions to our Lord, the
      Omniscient, is not something to take lightly (6:21; 6:93; 6:144; 7:37;
      10:17; 11:18; 29:68). We have seen people trying to freeze God's universal
      message with snap-shot understanding of a human messenger. We have seen people disoriented because of their insistence on following the Sunnah of "the Messenger of the Covenant" instead of indisputable facts.

      Despite all this mass reversion to shirk (associating partners to God),
      sure with a different idol and a different excuse, we have yet to see a
      single article in the Submitters Perspective criticizing this popular trend
      in this small community.  Muhammedans who idolized Muhammad after his
      departure did exactly the same. While they repeatedly reminded each other
      of the duties and the words of "the Final Prophet" they focused their
      criticism on Christians and Jews. In fact, they were repeating the same
      great blunder with a few minor changes.

      They ignored the warnings of monotheists who soon became a minority and they oppressed or suppressed their voice. Unfortunately, our community has not taken heed from this history and it is failing the divine test designed for every generation (29:2). While we criticize Muslim's addiction with mentioning Muhammad besides God in their religious articles and books, we also feel a compelling urge to insert Rashad's title "the Messenger of the Covenant" in our speeches and writings.

      "Is God not sufficient for His servant?. . ." (39:36)

      Well, should we remind those who follow the appendices, footnotes,
      subtitles, video and audio tapes of Rashad, one of the Sunnah of their
      messenger, like we remind Muhammedans of their own Hadith and Sunnah to expose their contradiction? Why not? Do you REMEMBER the only verse that was hanging on Rashad's office door for many years until  his
      assassination? Wasn't it 39:36? Also remember that 39:36 was the only verse that is underlined in his translation. And should I remind them of another hadith? Remember Appendix 19 of the Messenger of Covenant; what does it say about you? Do you remember Rashad's book "Quran, Hadiths and Islam?" Have you applied it to yourself?

      Besides creating modern versions of Hadith and Sunnah, some are trying
      their best to distort, pervert and dilute the great mathematical miracle of
      the Quran. As we know that some members of this community abused the
      mathematical code of the Quran with the unforgettable May 19, 1990 doomsday prophecy and they keep abusing it with their mathematical illiteracy. Some of them did not take heed from their blunder. Now they employ the same childish numerical manipulations to find more mathematical evidence for the messengership of a dead person. One of those doomsday prophets even claimed a divine rank through his childish calculations. Incredibly, he finds followers and supporters within this community.

      We have become extremely tolerant to the mushriks (those who set partners
      to God) among us. Probably, because of being trapped in cult-syndrome: we share the same unifying symbol, Rashad Khalifa, or "the Messenger of
      Covenant," equivalent to Muhammedans' repeated expression "Muhammad
      Sallallahu Aleyhi Wasallam." This cult or sectarian syndrome is addressed
      by an interesting Quranic verse:

      "Are your disbelievers better than those disbelievers? Have you been
      absolved by the Scripture?" (54:43).

      After Rashad's death, the fallible human messenger suddenly became an
      infallible messenger and all his work with all re-visions, contradictions
      and errors magically became another divine revelation. The devils who
      concocted or hoped such a mutation, in order to replace Rashad's
      translation with the original Quran, expunged the original from the
      translation. To imply an exclusive divine revelation, they also removed the
      name of those whom Rashad acknowledged for their assistance and
      contribution to the translation.

      In brief, members of this community are replacing the Hadith and Sunnah of
      Muhammad with Rashad's Appendices, footnotes, subtitles, audio and video tapes. Some of those who were addressing their messenger with his first name (Rashad) during his lifetime, soon after his departure, they developed a taboo against mentioning his first name. Muhammedans and those who repeat their blunder cannot commemorate their idols' names without words of praise or rank. Are we going to follow the footsteps of previous generations? What a miserable convergence! What a regression!:

      "Surely, those who slide back, after the guidance has been manifested to
      them, the devil has enticed them, and has misled them." (47:25)

      We cannot standby the repetition of the worst part of the history. If we
      cannot burn the new calf and throw it into the sea like Moses did, we might
      be required to repeat Saleh's words (7:79) to our people soon.

      This Ultimatom is endorsed by the following people:

      Apameh Bashar
      Mahmoud Abib
      Shawki Hamdan
      Milan Sulc
      Saeed Talari
      Sadruddin Karimboy
      Ali Fazeli
      Cathryn Kolton
      Sanobar Tafazoli
      Maryam Jenna
      Barbara Jeen
      Yasser Elkadi
      Hamid Baghdishi
      Fransisco Lay
      Daniel Lay
      Aisha Musa
      JOHN SPOONER
      Hossein Kowsary
      Ramtin Ghazi
      Haroon Khan
       

      PS:
      2. If you would like to put your name on the list above please let us know.
      1. The author has decided to prepare "19 Questions For Khalifites," as a
      next project, God willing.